[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
讨论·探索

南方海相页岩气解吸类型及其地质成因

  • 岳锋 ,
  • 赵天宇 ,
  • 安亮 ,
  • 李论基
展开
  • 甘肃省交通规划勘察设计院股份有限公司

岳锋,硕士,构造地质学专业,高级工程师,主要从事地质勘察研究工作。通信地址:730030 甘肃省兰州市城关区雁北路1689号甘肃省交通规划勘察设计院股份有限公司;E-mail:

Copy editor: 刘江丽

收稿日期: 2024-12-11

  修回日期: 2025-02-14

  网络出版日期: 2025-05-13

基金资助

甘肃省科技计划重点研发项目(25YFFA069)

Marine shale gas desorption types and its geological genesis in southern China

  • YUE Feng ,
  • ZHAO Tianyu ,
  • AN Liang ,
  • LI Lunji
Expand
  • Gansu Province Transportation Planning, Survey & Design Institute Co., Ltd

YUE Feng, MSc, Senior Engineer, mainly engaged in geological exploration and research work. Add: No. 1689 Yanbei Rd., Chengguan District, Lanzhou, Gansu 730030, China. E-mail:

Received date: 2024-12-11

  Revised date: 2025-02-14

  Online published: 2025-05-13

摘要

页岩气解吸规律可间接反映其富集程度和保存条件。基于变温解吸实验及解吸气成分测试,划分南方海相页岩气解吸类型,并对其成因进行了探讨。南方海相页岩气有4种解吸类型: ①常温解吸型。在地表温度条件下即大量解吸页岩气,解吸气以甲烷为主,良好的生气物质基础和保存条件、较发育的裂缝系统是其形成的主要原因。②地温解吸型。在地层温度条件下开始大量解吸,解吸气以甲烷为主,弱盖层封闭和侧向散失所导致压力封闭条件的缺失是其形成的主要原因。③高温解吸型。在90 ℃以上高温条件下开始大量解吸,解吸气中O2和N2含量较高,浅埋藏作用和破坏的保存条件是其形成的主要原因。④高温低气型。在高温条件下解吸气含量较低,解吸气中基本不含烃类气体,长期深埋藏作用和破坏的保存条件是其形成的主要原因。常温解吸型页岩气具有较好的勘探开发条件,地温解吸型目前不具备经济开发条件,高温解吸型和高温低气型无勘探价值。

本文引用格式

岳锋 , 赵天宇 , 安亮 , 李论基 . 南方海相页岩气解吸类型及其地质成因[J]. 海相油气地质, 2025 , 30(2) : 110 -118 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9854.2025.02.002

Abstract

Desorption characteristics reflect shale gas enrichment and its preservation conditions indirectly. Marine shale gas desorption types and their genesis in southern China have been divided and evaluated by thermal variation desorption test and gas constitution test. There are four marine shale gas desorption types. The atmospheric temperature desorption shale gas desorbed greatly under atmospheric temperature, the desorbed gas was mainly methane. Its main causes are ascribed to a good gas generation material base and preservation conditions, as well as well-developed fracture system. The reservoir temperature desorption shale gas desorbed greatly under reservoir temperature, the desorbed gas was also mainly methane. Its cause is ascribed to the absence of pressure sealing conditions formed mainly by weak caprock sealing and lateral dissipation. The high temperature desorption shale gas desorbed greatly under a high temperature above 90 ℃, the desorbed gas had relatively high O2 and N2 contents. Its causes are ascribed to shallow burial condition and destroyed preservation condition. High temperature-low content desorption shale gas desorbed a little gas under a high temperature above 90 ℃, the desorbed gas had little hydrocarbon. Its causes are ascribed to long time deep burial history and destroyed preservation condition. The atmospheric temperature desorption shale gas had better exploration and development condition, however, the reservoir temperature desorption shale gas maybe lack of economical development conditions at present. The other two types of shale gas are not worth further exploration.

[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[1]
李博, 魏国庆, 洪克岩, 等. 中国南方盆外复杂构造区页岩气井评价与认识: 以湖北来凤咸丰区块来页1井为例[J]. 天然气工业, 2016, 36(8): 29-35.

LI Bo, WEI Guoqing, HONG Keyan, et al. Evaluation and understanding on the shale gas wells in complex tectonic provinces outside Sichuan Basin, South China: a case study from Well Laiye 1 in Laifeng-Xianfeng Block, Hubei[J]. Natural gas industry, 2016, 36(8): 29-35.

[2]
郭彤楼. 中国式页岩气关键地质问题与成藏富集主控因素[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2016, 43(3): 317-326.

DOI

GUO Tonglou. Key geological issues and main controls on accumulation and enrichment of Chinese shale gas[J]. Petroleum exploration and development, 2016, 43(3): 317-326.

DOI

[3]
张志英, 杨盛波. 页岩气吸附解吸规律研究[J]. 实验力学, 2012, 27(4): 492-497.

ZHANG Zhiying, YANG Shengbo. On the adsorption and desorption trend of shale gas[J]. Journal of experimental mechanics, 2012, 27(4): 492-497.

[4]
郭为, 熊伟, 高树生, 等. 页岩气等温吸附/解吸特征[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 44(7): 2836-2840.

GUO Wei, XIONG Wei, GAO Shusheng, et al. Isothermal adsorption/desorption characteristics of shale gas[J]. Journal of Central South University(science and technology edition), 2013, 44(7): 2836-2840.

[5]
俞凌杰, 范明, 蒋启贵, 等. 页岩气现场解吸方法优化[J]. 石油实验地质, 2015, 37(3): 402-406.

YU Lingjie, FAN Ming, JIANG Qigui, et al. Optimization of shale gas desorption method in field[J]. Petroleum geology and experiment, 2015, 37(3): 402-406.

[6]
魏强, 晏波, 肖贤明. 页岩气解吸方法研究进展[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, 26(9): 1657-1665.

DOI

WEI Qiang, YAN Bo, XIAO Xianming. Research progress on the desorption methods of shale gas[J]. Natural gas geoscience, 2015, 26(9): 1657-1665.

DOI

[7]
王敬, 罗海山, 刘慧卿, 等. 页岩气吸附解吸效应对基质物性影响特征[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2016, 43(1): 145-152.

DOI

WANG Jing, LUO Haishan, LIU Huiqing, et al. Influences of adsorption/desorption of shale gas on the apparent properties of matrix pores[J]. Petroleum exploration and development, 2016, 43(1): 145-152.

DOI

[8]
岳长涛, 李术元, 李林玥, 等. 页岩气等温解吸特性研究[J]. 现代地质, 2017, 31(1): 150-157.

YUE Changtao, LI Shuyuan, LI Linyue, et al. Study on desorption properties of shale gas[J]. Geoscience, 2017, 31(1): 150-157.

[9]
张晓明, 石万忠, 舒志国, 等. 涪陵地区页岩含气量计算模型及应用[J]. 地球科学, 2017, 42(7): 1157-1168.

ZHANG Xiaoming, SHI Wanzhong, SHU Zhiguo, et al. Calculation model of shale gas content and its application in Fuling area[J]. Earth science, 2017, 42(7): 1157-1168.

[10]
高和群, 曹海虹, 曾隽. 页岩气解吸规律新认识[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2019, 26(2): 81-86.

GAO Hequn, CAO Haihong, ZENG Juan. New understanding of shale gas desorption law[J]. Petroleum geology and recovery efficiency, 2019, 26(2): 81-86.

[11]
姚红生. 南川地区浅层常压页岩气吸附解吸机理与开发实践[J]. 天然气工业, 2024, 44(2): 14-22.

YAO Hongsheng. Adsorption and desorption mechanism and development practice of shallow normal pressure shale gas in Nanchuan area[J]. Natural gas industry, 2024, 44(2): 14-22.

[12]
郭为, 熊伟, 高树生, 等. 温度对页岩等温吸附/解吸特征影响[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2013, 40(4): 481-485.

GUO Wei, XIONG Wei, GAO Shusheng, et al. Impact of temperature on the isothermal adsorption/desorption characteristics of shale gas[J]. Petroleum exploration and development, 2013, 40(4): 481-485.

[13]
唐颖, 张金川, 刘珠江, 等. 解吸法测量页岩含气量及其方法的改进[J]. 天然气工业, 2011, 31(10): 108-112.

TANG Ying, ZHANG Jinchuan, LIU Zhujiang, et al. Use and improvement of the desorption method in shale gas content tests[J]. Natural gas industry, 2011, 31(10): 108-112.

[14]
魏富彬, 刘珠江, 陈斐然, 等. 川东南五峰组—龙马溪组深层、超深层页岩储层特征及其页岩气勘探意义[J]. 石油实验地质, 2023, 45(4): 751-760.

WEI Fubin, LIU Zhujiang, CHEN Feiran, et al. Characteristics of the deep and ultra-deep shale reservoirs of the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formations in the southeastern Sichuan Basin and the significance of shale gas exploration[J]. Petroleum geology and experiment, 2023, 45(4): 751-760.

[15]
吴建发, 张成林, 赵圣贤, 等. 川南地区典型页岩气藏类型及勘探开发启示[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2023, 34(8): 1385-1400.

DOI

WU Jianfa, ZHANG Chenglin, ZHAO Shengxian, et al. Typical types of shale gas reservoirs in southern Sichuan Basin and enlightenment of exploration and development[J]. Natural gas geoscience, 2023, 34(8): 1385-1400.

DOI

[16]
聂海宽, 刘全有, 党伟, 等. 页岩型氦气富集机理与资源潜力: 以四川盆地五峰组—龙马溪组为例[J]. 中国科学(地球科学), 2023, 53(6): 1285-1294.

NIE Haikuan, LIU Quanyou, DANG Wei, et al. Enrichment mechanism and resource potential of shale-type helium: a case study of Wufeng Formation-Longmaxi Formation in Sichuan Basin[J]. Scientia sinica(terrae), 2023, 53(6): 1285-1294.

[17]
李昂, 石文睿, 袁志华, 等. 涪陵页岩气田焦石坝海相页岩气富集主控因素分析[J]. 非常规油气, 2016, 3(1): 27-34.

LI Ang, SHI Wenrui, YUAN Zhihua, et al. Main factors controlling marine shale gas accumulation in Jiaoshiba shale gas field of Fuling area[J]. Unconventional oil & gas, 2016, 3(1): 27-34.

[18]
秦华, 范小军, 刘明, 等. 焦石坝地区龙马溪组页岩解吸气地球化学特征及地质意义[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(7): 846-854.

DOI

QIN Hua, FAN Xiaojun, LIU Ming, et al. Geochemical characteristics and geological significance of desorbed shale gas in Longmaxi Formation, Jiaoshiba area[J]. Acta petrolei sinica, 2016, 37(7): 846-854.

DOI

[19]
杨振恒, 魏志红, 何文斌, 等. 川东南地区五峰组—龙马溪组页岩现场解吸气特征及其意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(1): 156-163.

DOI

YANG Zhenheng, WEI Zhihong, HE Wenbin, et al. Characteristics and significance of onsite gas desorption from Wufeng-Longmaxi shales in southeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural gas geoscience, 2017, 28(1): 156-163.

DOI

[20]
王玉满, 黄金亮, 王淑芳, 等. 四川盆地长宁、焦石坝志留系龙马溪组页岩气刻度区精细解剖[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(3): 423-432.

DOI

WANG Yuman, HUANG Jinliang, WANG Shufang, et al. Dissection of two calibrated areas of the Silurian Longmaxi Formation, Changning and Jiaoshiba, Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural gas geoscience, 2016, 27(3): 423-432.

DOI

[21]
李凯, 孟志勇, 吉婧, 等. 四川盆地涪陵地区五峰—龙马溪组解吸气特征及影响因素分析[J]. 石油实验地质, 2018, 40(1): 90-96.

LI Kai, MENG Zhiyong, JI Jing, et al. Characteristics and influencing factors of desorption gas in Wufeng-Longmaxi Formations in Fuling area, Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum geology and experiment, 2018, 40(1): 90-96.

[22]
金之钧, 胡宗全, 高波, 等. 川东南地区五峰组—龙马溪组页岩气富集与高产控制因素[J]. 地学前缘, 2016, 23(1): 1-10.

DOI

JIN Zhijun, HU Zongquan, GAO Bo, et al. Controlling factors on the enrichment and high productivity of shale gas in the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formations, southeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Earth science frontiers, 2016, 23(1): 1-10.

[23]
彭勇民, 龙胜祥, 何希鹏, 等. 彭水地区常压页岩气储层特征及有利区评价[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2020, 10(5): 12-19.

PENG Yongmin, LONG Shengxiang, HE Xipeng, et al. Characteristics of normal-pressure shale gas reservoirs and evaluation of its favorable areas in Pengshui[J]. Reservoir evaluation and development, 2020, 10(5): 12-19.

[24]
高键, 李慧莉, 何治亮, 等. 渝东彭水地区常压页岩气压力演化与富集保存[J]. 天然气工业, 2022, 42(8): 124-135.

GAO Jian, LI Huili, HE Zhiliang, et al. Pressure evolution, enrichment and preservation of normal-pressure shale gas in the Pengshui area of eastern Chongqing[J]. Natural gas industry, 2022, 42(8): 124-135.

[25]
郭彤楼, 张汉荣. 四川盆地焦石坝页岩气田形成与富集高产模式[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2014, 41(1): 28-36.

GUO Tonglou, ZHANG Hanrong. Formation and enrichment mode of Jiaoshiba shale gas field, Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum exploration and development, 2014, 41(1): 28-36.

[26]
郭旭升, 胡东风, 文治东, 等. 四川盆地及周缘下古生界海相页岩气富集高产主控因素: 以焦石坝地区五峰组—龙马溪组为例[J]. 中国地质, 2014, 41(3): 893-901.

GUO Xusheng, HU Dongfeng, WEN Zhidong, et al. Major factors controlling the accumulation and high productivity in marine shale gas in the Lower Paleozoic of Sichuan Basin and its periphery: a case study of the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation of Jiaoshiba area[J]. Geology in china, 2014, 41(3): 893-901.

[27]
郭彤楼, 刘若冰. 复杂构造区高演化程度海相页岩气勘探突破的启示: 以四川盆地东部盆缘JY1井为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2013, 24(4): 643-651.

DOI

GUO Tonglou, LIU Ruobing. Implications from marine shale gas exploration breakthrough in complicated structural area at high thermal stage: taking Longmaxi Formation in Well JY1 as an example[J]. Natural gas geoscience, 2013, 24(4): 643-651.

[28]
葛忠伟, 史洪亮, 周桦, 等. 川南寒武系筇竹寺组拉张槽边缘型页岩气地质特征及富集高产地质因素研究[J]. 非常规油气, 2025, 12(1): 19-29.

GE Zhongwei, SHI Hongliang, ZHOU Hua, et al. Geological characteristics of shale gas and research on enrichment and high production geological factors at edge of tensional trough of Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation in southern Sichuan[J]. Unconventional oil & gas, 2025, 12(1): 19-29.

[29]
王威, 刘珠江, 魏富彬, 等. 川东北地区二叠系大隆组页岩储层特征及其主控因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(5): 1355-1367.

WANG Wei, LIU Zhujiang, WEI Fubin, et al. Characteristics and determinants of shale reservoir development in the Permian Dalong Formation, northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & gas geology, 2024, 45(5): 1355-1367.

[30]
岳锋, 李永臣, 赵宝山, 等. 重庆下古生界页岩顺层滑脱变形域的形成及其地质意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(2): 229-238.

YUE Feng, LI Yongchen, ZHAO Baoshan, et al. Bedding decollement deformation domain in the Lower Paleozoic shales in Chongqing: formation and geological significance[J]. Oil & gas geology, 2018, 39(2): 229-238.

[31]
马勇, 钟宁宁, 韩辉, 等. 糜棱化富有机质页岩孔隙结构特征及其含义[J]. 中国科学(地球科学), 2014, 44(10): 2202-2209.

MA Yong, ZHONG Ningning, HAN Hui, et al. Definition and sturcture characteristics of pores in mylonitized organic-rich shales[J]. Scientia sinica(terrae), 2014, 44(10): 2202-2209.

文章导航

/

[an error occurred while processing this directive]