[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]|
郑剑锋,硕士,高级工程师,主要从事碳酸盐岩沉积储层与油气勘探研究工作。通信地址:310023 浙江省杭州市西湖区西溪路920号; E-mail: zhengjf_hz@petrochina.com.cn |
Copy editor: 韦东晓
收稿日期: 2024-10-20
修回日期: 2024-12-19
网络出版日期: 2025-05-13
基金资助
中国石油“十四五”攻关性应用性重大科技专项“碳酸盐岩油气富集规律及有利区带研究”(2023ZZ1601)
中国石油“十四五”前瞻性基础性重大科技专项“叠合盆地中下组合油气成藏与保持机制研究”(2023ZZ02)
New sedimentary models and their exploration significance of the Neoproterozoic-Paleozoic in the three ancient marine cratonic basins of China
|
ZHENG Jianfeng, MSc, Senior Engineer, mainly engaged in sedimentology and reservoir geology and oil and gas exploration of carbonate rocks. Add: No.920 Xixi Rd., Xihu District, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310023, China. E-mail: zhengjf_hz@petrochina.com.cn |
Received date: 2024-10-20
Revised date: 2024-12-19
Online published: 2025-05-13
随着三大海相克拉通盆地油气勘探不断向超深层、古老层系拓展,面临着有利勘探区带不明确的问题,亟需深化重点时期沉积模式的研究。对三大盆地新元古界—古生界构造-沉积差异演化特征进行总结,分析了构造分异对沉积演化的控制作用,指出三大古老海相克拉通盆地“裂—坳—隆”构造分异控制碳酸盐台地经历“孤立台地—缓坡—镶边”演化旋回,裂陷的形成和演化控制了台地沉积分异及纵向上源储盖组合的相似性。建立了4类碳酸盐沉积新模式:①“多类台缘”和“双滩”缓坡沉积模式揭示大陆边缘和裂陷边缘、坳陷边缘、内缓坡相带中古隆起和潟湖周缘是有利丘滩体发育区;②碳酸盐岩与膏盐岩组合体系沉积模式揭示海侵期古隆起周缘是有利滩体发育区;③四川盆地灯影组断阶型台缘沉积模式揭示多组同沉积断裂控制灯二段阶梯状台缘形成,断块高部位发育厚层丘滩体;④塔里木盆地寒武系持续扩展型台缘沉积模式揭示轮南—富满地区台缘带经历了富泥质缓坡→低角度前积缓坡—弱镶边台地→垂向加积镶边台地→侧向前积镶边台地的演化。沉积模式新认识明确了三大古老海相克拉通盆地的古裂陷周缘丘滩带依然是增储上产和资源接替的重要领域,斜坡相重力流沉积、蒸发潟湖相泥灰岩等新领域是值得关注的勘探区带。沉积新模式的建立有力支撑了油气勘探部署,也为未来勘探提供了新方向、新思路。
郑剑锋 , 朱永进 , 张本健 , 孙崇浩 , 李文正 , 吴东旭 , 周进高 . 中国三大古老海相克拉通盆地新元古界—古生界沉积新模式及勘探意义[J]. 海相油气地质, 2025 , 30(2) : 97 -109 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9854.2025.02.001
With the continuous expansion of oil and gas exploration into ultra-deep and ancient strata in the three major marine cratonic basins, challenges such as unclear favorable exploration zones have emerged. Therefore it is imperative to deepen research on depositional models for critical geological periods. Based on the summary of the Neoproterozoic-Paleozoic tectonic-sedimentary differential evolution characteristics of the three major basins, this paper analyzes the controlling effects of tectonic differentiation on sedimentary evolution. It is pointed out that the three ancient marine cratonic basins exhibit a tectonic differentiation pattern of "rift-depression-uplift", driving carbonate platforms undergoing an evolutionary cycle of "isolated platform-ramp-rimmed platform", and the formation and evolution of rifts control the sedimentary differentiation of platforms and the similarity of the vertical sourced-reservoer-cap assemblages. Four new models of carbonate sedimentation were established: "multi-type platform margins" and "double shoals" ramp models, carbonate-gypsum/salt symbiotic system model, fault terrace platform margin model of Dengying Formation in Sichuan Basin, and continuously expanding platform margin sedimentary model of Cambrian in Tarim Basin. The "multi-type platform margins" and "double shoals" ramp model reveal that the continental margin and rift margin, depression margin, paleo-uplift of inner ramp and lagoon periphery are favorable mound-shoal development areas. The carbonate-gypsum/salt symbiotic system model reveals that the margin of the paleo-uplift during transgression period is a favorable shoal development area. The fault terrace platform margin sedimentary model indicates that multiple syndepositional fault systems control the formation of step-like platform margins of the 2nd member of Dengying Formation in Sichuan Basin, with thick mound-shoal complexes developed on high fault blocks. The continuous extension platform margin sedimentary model reveals that the Cambrian platform margin belt of Lunnan-Gucheng area in Tarim Basin has undergone the evolution of mud-rich ramp→low-angle progradational ramp/weakly rimmed platform→vertically aggrading platform→laterally prograding rimmed platform. The new understanding of carbonate sedimentary models confirms that the mound-shoal belts around the paleo-rift of the three ancient marine craton basins are still important areas for increasing oil and gas reserves and ensuring resource succession. In addition, new fields such as gravity flow deposits in slope facies and marlstones in evaporative lagoon facies are worthy of exploration. The establishment of the new models of carbonate sedimentation strongly supports the deployment of oil and gas exploration, and also provides a new direction and ideas for future exploration.
| [1] |
马永生. 碳酸盐岩微相:分析、解释及应用[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2006.
|
| [2] |
周进高, 斯春松, 张建勇, 等. 碳酸盐岩障壁台地与储层发育规律[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2015.
|
| [3] |
冯增昭. 碳酸盐岩沉积环境及岩相古地理的研究[J]. 石油实验地质, 1980(3): 24-31.
|
| [4] |
刘宝珺. 沉积相模式与层控矿床[J]. 地质与勘探, 1981(12): 1-9.
|
| [5] |
高志前, 樊太亮, 焦志峰, 等. 塔里木盆地寒武—奥陶系碳酸盐岩台地样式及其沉积响应特征[J]. 沉积学报, 2006, 24(1): 19-27.
|
| [6] |
陈洪德, 钟怡江, 许效松, 等. 中国西部三大盆地海相碳酸盐岩台地边缘类型及特征[J]. 岩石学报, 2014, 30(3): 609-621.
|
| [7] |
周进高, 张建勇, 邓红婴, 等. 四川盆地震旦系灯影组岩相古地理与沉积模式[J]. 天然气工业, 2017, 37(1): 24-31.
|
| [8] |
何金海, 李国蓉, 彭博. 碳酸盐岩地震地貌学研究与应用: 以四川盆地东北部上二叠统长兴组为例[J]. 海相油气地质, 2014, 19(4): 45-49.
|
| [9] |
曾洪流, 赵文智, 徐兆辉, 等. 地震沉积学在碳酸盐岩中的应用: 以四川盆地高石梯—磨溪地区寒武系龙王庙组为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(5): 775-784.
|
| [10] |
朱筱敏, 董艳蕾, 曾洪流, 等. 中国地震沉积学研究现状和发展思考[J]. 古地理学报, 2020, 22(3): 397-411.
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
万天丰, 朱鸿. 古生代与三叠纪中国各陆块在全球古大陆再造中的位置与运动学特征[J]. 现代地质, 2007, 21(1): 1-13.
|
| [13] |
郭忠铭, 张军, 于忠平. 鄂尔多斯地块油区构造演化特征[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 1994, 21(2): 22-29.
|
| [14] |
李皎, 何登发. 四川盆地及邻区寒武纪古地理与构造-沉积环境演化[J]. 古地理学报, 2014(4): 441-460.
|
| [15] |
易士威, 李明鹏, 郭绪杰, 等. 塔里木盆地寒武系盐下勘探领域的重大突破方向[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(11): 1281-1295.
|
| [16] |
张成弓, 陈安清, 侯林君, 等. 中国西部古老海相沉积建造的典型结构样式及勘探指向[J]. 沉积学报, 2021, 39(6): 1491-1505.
|
| [17] |
郝杰, 翟明国. 罗迪尼亚超大陆与晋宁运动和震旦系[J]. 地质科学, 2004, 39(1): 139-152.
|
| [18] |
罗志立. 略论地裂运动与中国油气分布[J]. 中国地质科学院院报, 1984(3): 93-101.
|
| [19] |
刘树根, 孙玮, 罗志立, 等. 兴凯地裂运动与四川盆地下组合油气勘探[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 40(5): 511-520.
|
| [20] |
汪泽成, 姜华, 王铜山, 等. 四川盆地桐湾期古地貌特征及成藏意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2014, 41(3): 305-312.
|
| [21] |
周进高, 沈安江, 张建勇, 等. 四川盆地德阳—安岳台内裂陷与震旦系勘探方向[J]. 海相油气地质, 2018, 23(2): 1-9.
|
| [22] |
管树巍, 吴林, 任荣, 等. 中国主要克拉通前寒武纪裂谷分布与油气勘探前景[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(1): 9-22.
|
| [23] |
王坤, 王铜山, 汪泽成, 等. 华北克拉通南缘长城系裂谷特征与油气地质条件[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(5): 504-517.
|
| [24] |
冯许魁, 刘永彬, 韩长伟, 等. 塔里木盆地震旦系裂谷发育特征及其对油气勘探的指导意义[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2015, 29(2): 5-10.
|
| [25] |
姜海健, 陈强路, 杨鑫, 等. 塔里木盆地新元古代裂谷盆地层序样式[J]. 地质学报, 2017, 91(3): 588-604.
|
| [26] |
孙冬胜, 李双建, 云金表, 等. 中国海相克拉通盆地古隆起的活动性与油气分布[J]. 地质学报, 2017, 91(7): 1589-1603.
|
| [27] |
杜金虎, 汪泽成, 邹才能, 等. 上扬子克拉通内裂陷的发现及对安岳特大型气田形成的控制作用[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(1): 1-16.
|
| [28] |
许海龙, 魏国齐, 贾承造, 等. 乐山—龙女寺古隆起构造演化及对震旦系成藏的控制[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39(4): 406-416.
|
| [29] |
杨跃明, 文龙, 罗冰, 等. 四川盆地乐山—龙女寺古隆起震旦系天然气成藏特征[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2016, 43(2): 179-188.
|
| [30] |
何登发, 周新源, 杨海军, 等. 塔里木盆地克拉通内古隆起的成因机制与构造类型[J]. 地学前缘, 2008, 15(2): 207-221.
|
| [31] |
邬光辉, 李启明, 肖中尧, 等. 塔里木盆地古隆起演化特征及油气勘探[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2009, 33(1): 124-130.
|
| [32] |
杨华, 王宝清, 孙六一, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地古隆起周边地区奥陶系马家沟组储层影响因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2013, 25(3): 9-16, 35.
|
| [33] |
周进高, 刘新社, 沈安江, 等. 中国海相含油气盆地构造-岩相古地理特征[J]. 海相油气地质, 2019, 24(4): 27-37.
|
| [34] |
周进高, 姚根顺, 杨光, 等. 四川盆地安岳大气田震旦系—寒武系储层的发育机制[J]. 天然气工业, 2015, 35(1): 36-44.
|
| [35] |
杨威, 魏国齐, 赵蓉蓉, 等. 四川盆地震旦系灯影组岩溶储层特征及展布[J]. 天然气工业, 2014, 34(3): 55-60.
|
| [36] |
郑剑锋, 袁文芳, 黄理力, 等. 塔里木盆地肖尔布拉克露头区下寒武统肖尔布拉克组沉积相模式及其勘探意义[J]. 古地理学报, 2019, 21(4): 589-602.
|
| [37] |
朱永进, 郑剑锋, 俞广, 等. 塔里木盆地轮南—古城地区寒武系大型台地边缘层序结构、沉积演化及油气勘探潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(7): 1061-1077.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |