PDF(7808 KB)
Field geological modeling of the dolomite reservoirs of the 4th member of Dengying Formation in Ningqiang area, northern margin of the Sichuan Basin
JIN Tianjie, SHEN Anjiang, HU Anping, DUAN Junmao, LI Xi, ZHANG Huiliang
Marine Origin Petroleum Geology ›› 2026, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (3) : 223-235.
PDF(7808 KB)
PDF(7808 KB)
Field geological modeling of the dolomite reservoirs of the 4th member of Dengying Formation in Ningqiang area, northern margin of the Sichuan Basin
To address the issues of strong heterogeneity in the 4th member of the Dengying Formation reservoir in the Sichuan Basin and insufficient constraints for reservoir prediction using subsurface data, a well-exposed (algae) mound-shoal complexes profile of the 4th member of the Dengying Formation in Ningqiang area, northern margin of the Sichuan Basin is selected as a field prototype model. Based on detailed field surveying, sampling, and rock thin section analysis, this study establishes a dolomite reservoir model and defines the spatial relationship between reservoir parameters and lithofacies architecture. The following insights are obtained: (1) The 4th member of the Dengying Formation in Ningqiang area can be divided into lower, middle, and upper sub-members, forming a shallowing-upward cycle from middle ramp to weakly rimmed platform margin to strongly rimmed platform margin. The main rock types are microbial dolomite and crystalline dolomite, with microbial dolomite being the dominant type, including algal peloidal dolomite, algal stromatolite dolomite, algal laminated dolomite, algal framework dolomite, and algal thrombolite dolomite. The upper sub-member develops typical platform-margin (algae) mound-shoal complexes, in which algal framework dolomite, algal stromatolite dolomite, and algal thrombolite dolomite have porosity > 4.5%; algal peloidal dolomite and fine-crystalline dolomite have porosity between 2.5% and 3.5%. Toward the interior of the platform, algal laminated dolomite, very fine-muddy crystalline dolomite have porosity < 2.5%. (2) The reservoir spaces in algal framework dolomite and algal thrombolite dolomite are characterized by large pores and throats; those in algal stromatolite dolomite, algal peloidal dolomite and fine-crystalline dolomite are characterized by medium-sized pores and throats; and those in algal laminated dolomite, very fine-muddy crystalline dolomite are characterized by small pores and throats, exhibiting a dual pore-throat structure. (3) The stacking pattern of the lithofacies is clear: algal peloidal dolomite and fine-crystalline dolomite represent clastic shoal deposits in the mound base and inter-mound areas; algal stromatolite dolomite represents deposits during the colonization stage of microbial mounds above the mound base; algal framework dolomite represents mound core construction; and algal thrombolite dolomite represents mound-flank deposits, exhibiting a "small mound, large shoal" pattern. These results indicate that the platform-margin mound-shoal complex in the upper sub-member of the 4th member of the Dengying Formation in northern Sichuan Basin is extensively developed, representing a favorable zone for high-quality reservoir development.
mound-shoal complex / dolomite reservoir / field geological modeling / Dengying Formation / Kangjiadong section / northern margin of Sichuan Basin
| [1] |
魏国齐, 张本健, 谢增业, 等. 深层超深层碳酸盐岩特大型气田形成主控因素: 以四川盆地安岳和蓬莱气田为例[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2025, 30(2): 1-15.
|
| [2] |
杨雨, 文龙, 宋泽章, 等. 川中古隆起北部蓬莱气区多层系天然气勘探突破与潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(10): 1351-1368, 1394.
|
| [3] |
文龙, 谢继容, 张本健, 等. 四川盆地德阳—安岳裂陷西侧大探1井震旦系灯影组天然气勘探重大突破及意义[J]. 天然气工业, 2023, 43(11): 7-18.
|
| [4] |
张飞, 张浪, 张连进, 等. 蓬莱气田db1区震旦系灯影组四段深层碳酸盐岩储层分类预测[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2025, 30(2): 84-97.
|
| [5] |
李柱正, 石晶慧萃, 王家辉, 等. 川中德阳—安岳古裂陷槽震旦系灯影组残丘型储层特征及其油气勘探意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2022, 33(8): 1263-1275.
|
| [6] |
赵文智, 王小芳, 王鑫, 等. 四川盆地震旦系灯影组地层厘定与岩相古地理特征[J]. 古地理学报, 2022, 24(5): 852-870.
|
| [7] |
郭旭升, 胡东风, 段金宝, 等. 四川盆地北部宁强胡家坝灯影组四段岩石特征及沉积环境分析[J]. 石油实验地质, 2018, 40(6): 749-756.
|
| [8] |
汪泽成, 姜华, 陈志勇, 等. 中上扬子地区晚震旦世构造古地理及油气地质意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(5): 884-897.
|
| [9] |
马奎, 文龙, 张本健, 等. 四川盆地德阳—安岳侵蚀裂陷槽分段性演化分析和油气勘探意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2022, 49(2): 274-284.
|
| [10] |
李双建, 孙冬胜, 蔡立国, 等. 川北米仓山山前带碎屑锆石U-Pb年代学及盆山演化意义[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2018, 42(6): 1087-1107.
|
| [11] |
丁一, 刘树根, 文龙, 等. 绵阳—长宁拉张槽东北缘埃迪卡拉系灯影组上部地层缺失及构造意义[J]. 地质学报, 2025, 99(2): 352-364.
|
| [12] |
郭旭升, 胡东风, 黄仁春, 等. 川东北地区胡家坝震旦系灯影组古油藏特征及其油气勘探意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(4): 673-683.
|
| [13] |
沈安江, 李杰, 龙晓平, 等. 四川盆地北缘亢家洞灯影组四段焦沥青Re-Os定年与烃源岩示踪[J]. 岩石学报, 2022, 38(6): 1702-1712.
|
| [14] |
王良军. 川北地区灯影组四段优质储层特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(2): 35-45.
|
| [15] |
王振宇, 张云峰, 杨红强, 等. 塔里木板块塔中83井-16 井区上奥陶统礁滩复合体储层结构[J]. 高校地质学报, 2011, 17(4): 577-585.
|
| [16] |
代宗仰, 周翼, 陈景山, 等. 塔中中上奥陶统礁、滩相储层的特征及评价[J]. 西南石油学院学报, 2001, 23(4): 1-4.
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
郑剑锋, 沈安江, 乔占峰. 基于数字露头的三维地质建模技术: 以塔里木盆地一间房剖面一间房组礁滩复合体为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(5): 108-115.
|
| [20] |
乔占峰, 沈安江, 郑剑锋, 等. 基于数字露头模型的碳酸盐岩储集层三维地质建模[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2015, 42(3): 328-337.
|
| [21] |
乔占峰, 郑剑锋, 张杰, 等. 海相碳酸盐岩储层建模和表征技术进展及应用[J]. 海相油气地质, 2019, 24(4):15-26.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |