扬子区二叠系孤峰组(段)页岩气储层特征及勘探潜力

倪超, 吴伟, 杨雨然, 李梦莹, 李文正, 王鹏万, 付小东, 王俞策, 李润彤, 曹全斌

海相油气地质 ›› 2026, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (2) : 175-188.

PDF(10846 KB)
ISSN 1672-9854
CN 33-1328/P
PDF(10846 KB)
海相油气地质 ›› 2026, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (2) : 175-188. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9854.2026.02.006
勘探评价

扬子区二叠系孤峰组(段)页岩气储层特征及勘探潜力

作者信息 +

Reservoir characteristics and exploration potential for shale gas in the Permian Gufeng Formation (Member) in the Yangtze Region

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

扬子区二叠系孤峰组(段)作为一套具有显著穿时特征的海相富有机质黑色岩系,是重要的页岩气勘探接替层系。以扬子区二叠系孤峰组(段)为研究对象,对其时空分异规律、生烃特征、储层特征及保存条件进行了系统分析和总结。孤峰组(段)自西向东呈“东西分异、多中心沉积”的格局,其分布受控于古构造、海平面变化与沉积环境的协同作用。储层岩性以硅质页岩和碳质页岩为主,矿物组合呈“高硅、富钙、低黏土”的特征,脆性矿物含量高(平均85%),具备优良的可压裂性。储集空间类型多样,以有机质孔和溶蚀孔为主,孔径分布以介孔为主体。孔隙发育和含气性具有显著的区域分异性,表现为“西好东差”:上扬子区生烃品质优(TOC为 3%~10%,1型干酪根)、储层物性好(平均孔隙度为4.46%)、含气量高(平均值>4 m³/t)、保存条件有利,是页岩气富集的核心区;中扬子区埋藏浅(<2 000 m)、热演化适中,具备工程成本优势,但储层非均质性强;下扬子区埋深适中,但储层物性(平均孔隙度为1.99%)、含气量和保存条件普遍偏差,勘探潜力受限。综合评价认为:上扬子区(广元—巴中—达州、奉节—恩施)是类最有利勘探区,但需攻克深层工程技术挑战;中扬子区(京山—武汉)是类有利兼探区,应寻找地质-工程的“甜点”;下扬子区(无为—宣城)为类潜力风险区。

Abstract

The Permian Guofeng Formation (Member) in the Yangtze Region is a set of marine organic-rich black shale series exhibiting distinct diachronous characteristics, serving as a key replacement stratigraphic unit for shale gas exploration. This paper systematically analyzes and summarizes the spatiotemporal differentiation patterns, hydrocarbon generation characteristics, reservoir characteristics, and preservation conditions of the Permian Gufeng Formation (Member) in the Yangtze Region. From west to east, the Gufeng Formation (Member) exhibits a pattern of "east-west differentiation and multi-center sedimentation" with its distribution controlled by the synergistic effects of paleo-tectonics, sea-level fluctuations, and sedimentary environments. The reservoir lithologies are dominated by siliceous and carbonaceous shales, exhibiting a mineral combination characterized by " high silica, rich calcium, and low clay content ". The content of brittle minerals is high (averaging 85%), indicating excellent fracturability. Reservoir space types are diverse, dominated by organic pores and dissolution pores, with mesopores constituting the main pore size distribution. Pore development and gas content exhibit significant regional differentiation, characterized by "better in the west, poorer in the east". In the Upper Yangtze Region, the hydrocarbon generation quality is excellent (TOC 3%-10%, Type Ⅰ-Ⅱ₁ kerogen), reservoir physical properties are good (average porosity 4.46%), gas content is high (average >4 m³/t), and preservation conditions are favorable, making it the core area for shale gas enrichment. In the Middle Yangtze Region, shallow burial depth (<2 000 m) and moderate thermal evolution provide engineering cost advantages, but reservoir heterogeneity is strong. In the Lower Yangtze Region, burial depth is moderate, but reservoir physical properties (average porosity 1.99%), gas content, and preservation conditions are generally poor, limiting exploration potential. Comprehensive evaluation indicates that the Upper Yangtze Region (Guangyuan-Bazhong-Dazhou, Fengjie-Enshi) is the most favorable Class Ⅰ exploration area, though deep engineering challenges must be overcome; the Middle Yangtze Region (Jingshan-Wuhan) is a Class Ⅱ favorable exploration area where geological-engineering "sweet spots" should be targeted; the Lower Yangtze Region (Wuwei-Xuancheng) is a Class Ⅲ potential risk zone.

关键词

黑色岩系 / 页岩气 / 储层特征 / 勘探潜力 / 孤峰组(段) / 二叠系 / 扬子区

Key words

black rock series / shale gas / reservoir characteristics / exploration potential / Gufeng Formation(Member) / Permian System / Yangtze Region

引用本文

导出引用
倪超, 吴伟, 杨雨然, . 扬子区二叠系孤峰组(段)页岩气储层特征及勘探潜力[J]. 海相油气地质. 2026, 31(2): 175-188 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-9854.2026.02.006
NI Chao, WU Wei, YANG Yuran, et al. Reservoir characteristics and exploration potential for shale gas in the Permian Gufeng Formation (Member) in the Yangtze Region[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology. 2026, 31(2): 175-188 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-9854.2026.02.006
中图分类号: TE121   

参考文献

[1]
赵新胜. 下扬子皖南地区二叠系孤峰组页岩沉积环境及储层研究[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2021.
ZHAO Xinsheng. The sedimentary environment and reservoir characteristics of Middle Permian shale in the Lower Yangtze area of southern Anhui[D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences(Beijing), 2021.
[2]
徐伟民. 苏浙皖地区二叠系硅质来源及其与油气关系的探讨[J]. 石油实验地质, 1990(1): 44-48.
XU Weimin. On the origins of the Permian siliceous rocks in Jiangsu-Zhejiang-Anhui Provinces and their relation with the generation of oil and gas[J]. Petroleum geology & experiment, 1990(1): 44-48.
[3]
陈尚斌, 朱炎铭, 李伍, 等. 扬子区页岩气和煤层气联合开发的地质优选[J]. 辽宁工程技术大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 30(5): 672-676.
CHEN Shangbin, ZHU Yanming, LI Wu, et al. Geological optimization of shale gas and coalbed methane combined research & develop in Yangtze, China[J]. Journal of Liaoning Technical University(natural science edition), 2011, 30(5): 672-676.
[4]
黄保家, 施荣富, 赵幸滨, 等. 下扬子皖南地区古生界页岩气形成条件及勘探潜力评价[J]. 煤炭学报, 2013, 38(5): 877-882.
HUANG Baojia, SHI Rongfu, ZHAO Xingbin, et al. Geological conditions of Paleozoic shale gas formation and its exploration potential in the South Anhui, Lower Yangtze Area[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2013, 38(5): 877-882.
[5]
李飞, 史海英, 昝灵, 等. 安徽南陵—无为地区二叠系烃源岩有机地球化学特征[J]. 地质学刊, 2013, 37(1): 31-40.
LI Fei, SHI Haiying, ZAN Ling, et al. Organic geochemistry of Permian source rocks in Nanling-Wuwei area of Anhui[J]. Journal of geology, 2013, 37(1): 31-40.
[6]
陈平, 张敏强, 许永哲, 等. 下扬子巢湖—泾县地区上二叠统大隆组泥页岩储层特征[J]. 岩石学报, 2013, 29(8): 2925-2935.
CHEN Ping, ZHANG Minqiang, XU Yongzhe, et al. The shale reservoir characteristic of Dalong Formation Upper Permian in Chaohu-Jingxian, Lower Yangtze Area[J]. Acta petrologica sinica, 2013, 29(8): 2925
[7]
徐菲菲, 张训华, 黄正清, 等. 下扬子地区宁国凹陷大隆组—孤峰组泥页岩储层特征[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 46(2): 180-190.
XU Feifei, ZHANG Xunhua, HUANG Zhengqing, et al. Characteristics of the Dalong and Gufeng Formation shale reservoirs in Ningguo Depression, Lower Yangtze Region, China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(science & technology edition), 2019, 46(2): 180-190.
[8]
王汝建. 安徽巢湖孤峰组的放射虫化石[J]. 古生物学报, 1993, 32(4): 442-457, 525-526, 551-552.
WANG Rujian. Fossil radiolaria from Kufeng Formation of Chaohu, Anhui[J]. Acta palaeontologica sinica, 1993, 32(4): 442-457, 525-526,551-552.
[9]
顾忠安, 郑荣才, 黄建良, 等. 苏皖地区二叠系页岩气成藏地质条件[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2014(3): 274-282.
GU Zhongan, ZHENG Rongcai, HUANG Jianliang, et al. Geological conditions of Permian shale gas accumulation in Jiangsu-Anhui of China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(science & technology edition), 2014(3): 274-282.
[10]
梁西文, 吴勘, 马强分, 等. 扬子北缘中二叠统孤峰组不同岩性孔隙特征及其地质意义[J]. 地质科技情报, 2014, 33(3): 78-86.
LIANG Xiwen, WU Kan, MA Qiangfen, et al. Pore characteristics of different lithologies and their geological significance from the Middle Permian Gufeng Formation in the north margin of Yangtze[J]. Bulletin of geological science and technology, 2014, 33(3): 78-86.
[11]
付小东, 陈娅娜, 罗冰, 等. 四川盆地北部中二叠统茅口组孤峰段优质烃源岩特征及其油气地质意义[J]. 地质学报, 2021, 95(6): 1903-1920.
FU Xiaodong, CHEN Yana, LUO Bing, et al. Characteristics and petroleum geological significance of the high-quality source rocks in the Gufeng Member of the Middle Permian Maokou Formation in the northern Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta geologica sinica, 2021, 95(6): 1903-1920.
[12]
王登, 冷双梁, 陈威, 等. 湖北京山地区孤峰组页岩气地质条件及远景区划分[J]. 华南地质, 2021, 37(2): 193-204.
WANG Deng, LENG Shuangliang, CHEN Wei, et al. Geological conditions and prospecting area delineation of Gufeng Formation shale gas in the Jingshan area, Hubei Province[J]. South China geology, 2021, 37(2): 193-204.
[13]
房双艺. 下扬子区中上二叠统硅质岩成因及页岩气潜力[D]. 南京: 南京大学, 2021.
FANG Shuangyi. Middle-Upper Permian siliceous rocks in Lower Yangtze Area origin and shale gas potential[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University, 2021.
[14]
姚素平, 吴聿元, 余文端, 等. 下扬子区孤峰组—大隆组露头剖面特征与岩相变化[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(1): 215-232, 245.
YAO Suping, WU Yuyuan, YU Wenduan, et al. Outcrop characteristic and lithofacies changes of both Gufeng and Dalong Formations in Lower Yangtze Region[J]. Reservoir evaluation and development, 2022, 12(1): 215-232, 245.
[15]
龚赞, 黄宁, 邵威, 等. 皖南无为地区中二叠统孤峰组页岩气有利区优选[J]. 中国石油和化工标准与质量, 2023, 43(21): 125-126, 129.
GONG Zan, HUANG Ning, SHAO Wei, et al. Optimization of favorable areas for shale gas in Middle Permian Gufeng Formation in Wuwei area, southern Anhui[J]. China petroleum and chemical standard and quality, 2023, 43(21): 125-126, 129.
[16]
姜生玲, 彭传圣, 周庆华, 等. 鹤峰地区中上二叠统海相页岩储层非均质性特征: 以HD1井为例[J]. 海相油气地质, 2024, 29(1): 71-80.
JIANG Shengling, PENG Chuansheng, ZHOU Qinghua, et al. The heterogeneity characteristics of marine shale reservoirs of Middle-Upper Permian in Hefeng area: a case study of the Well HD1[J]. Marine origin petroleum geology, 2024, 29(1): 71-80.
[17]
吴根耀, 马力. “盆”“山”耦合和脱耦的反转点和切入点研究[J]. 石油实验地质, 2005, 27(1): 8-17, 24.
WU Genyao, MA Li. An approach to the study of inversion points and tangency-in points for orogeny and coupled/decoupled basin development[J]. Petroleum geology & experiment, 2005, 27(1): 8-17, 24.
[18]
田在艺, 史卜庆. 中国中新生界沉积盆地与油气成藏[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2002, 26(1): 1-5.
TIAN Zaiyi, SHI Buqing. Geological features and petroleum reservoir formation in Meso-Cenozoic sedimentary basins in China[J]. Geotectonic et metallogenia, 2002, 26(1): 1-5.
[19]
李阳, 薛兆杰, 程喆, 等. 中国深层油气勘探开发进展与发展方向[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2020, 25(1): 45-57.
摘要
向地球深部进军、拓展深层油气资源,对于筑牢中国能源安全的资源基础具有重要的现实与战略意义,也是加大中国油气勘探开发力度的现实领域。在系统总结全球深层油气勘探开发形势和中国深层油气勘探开发进展基础上,深入分析了中国深层油气发展潜力、重点研究领域与科技攻关方向。中国深层油气资源丰富、勘探开发程度低,中西部叠合盆地深层发育的多套油气成藏组合、东部断陷盆地深洼区岩性与前中&mdash;新生界古潜山油气藏、深层页岩气等资源潜力巨大,勘探开发前景广阔,是未来重点研究领域。科技攻关方面需加强深层油气形成机制、分布规律及深部流体流动机理研究,开展基于地球物理的深部目标识别与预测、复杂地层条件优快钻井和复杂储层改造等关键技术攻关。同时,大力推动管理创新,进一步加强理论与技术、企业与部门间的协同攻关,加强勘探开发一体化、地质工程一体化的管理和运行,为深层油气高效勘探与有效开发提供有力保障。
LI Yang, XUE Zhaojie, CHENG Zhe, et al. Progress and development directions of deep oil and gas exploration and development in China[J]. China petroleum exploration, 2020, 25(1): 45-57.
It is of great practical and strategic importance to march deeper into the earth to explore deep oil and gas resources and to build up a solid resource base for energy security in China. There is therefore also a pragmatic imperative to increase the intensity of oil and gas exploration and development in China. Based on an exhaustive summary of the global situation in deep oil and gas exploration and development, and the progress that has already been made by China, the development potential, key research fields and scientific and technological research directions of deep oil and gas in China are comprehensively analyzed in this paper. China is rich in deep oil and gas resources, but with a generally low degree of exploration and development. There are many promising exploration and development prospects with great resource potential, such as multiple source-reservoir-cap assemblages in the deep formations of superimposed basins in Central and Western China, deep lithological reservoirs and Pre-Mesozoic-Cenozoic buried-hill reservoirs in fault basins in Eastern China, deep shale gas, etc. These are the principal directions for future exploration and development. It is necessary to strengthen research on the accumulation mechanisms and distribution laws of deep oil and gas, as well as the flow mechanisms of deep fluids, and to carry out key technical research, such as deep target identification and prediction based on geophysics, optimized fast drilling under complex formation conditions, and stimulation technologies for complex reservoirs. At the same time, it is also necessary to vigorously promote innovation in management, further enhance cooperation between theory and technology and between enterprises and departments, and to strengthen the management and operation of exploration-development integration and geology-engineering integration. This will provide strong support for the efficient exploration and development of deep oil and gas resources.
[20]
LIU Shugen, YANG Yu, DENG Bin, et al. Tectonic evolution of the Sichuan Basin, Southwest China[J]. Earth-science reviews, 2021, 213: 103470.
[21]
米立军, 吴克强, 刘志峰, 等. 从扬子地区海相烃源岩分布规律看南黄海盆地中—古生界有利勘探领域[J]. 中国海上油气, 2022, 34(2): 1-13.
MI Lijun, WU Keqiang, LIU Zhifeng, et al. Favorable exploration field analysis of Mesozoic-Paleozoic in South Yellow Sea Basin from the distribution characteristics of marine source rocks in the Yangtze Region[J]. China offshore oil and gas, 2022, 34(2): 1-13.
[22]
冯增昭, 何幼斌, 吴胜和. 中下扬子地区二叠纪岩相古地理[J]. 沉积学报, 1993, 11(3): 13-24.
FENG Zengzhao, HE Youbin, WU Shenghe. Listhofacies paleogeography of Permian Middle and Lower Yangtze Region[J]. Acta sedimentologica sinica, 1993, 11(3): 13-24.
[23]
夏邦栋. 下扬子前中生代构造演化[J]. 成都理工学院学报, 1998, 25 (2): 146-152.
XIA Bangdong. Pre-Mesozoic tectonic evolution of the Lower Yangtze Region[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology, 1998, 25 (2): 146-152.
[24]
ITO T, TAKAHASHI K U, MATSUOKA A, et al. The Guadalupian (Permian) Gufeng Formation on the north margin of the South China block: a review of the lithostratigraphy, radiolarian biostratigraphy, and geochemical characteristics[J]. Paleontological research, 2019, 23(4): 261-280.
[25]
易海永, 张本健, 谷明峰, 等. 四川盆地东部地区二叠系茅口组孤立浅滩的发现及天然气勘探潜力[J]. 天然气工业, 2024, 44(6): 1-11.
YI Haiyong, ZHANG Benjian, GU Mingfeng, et al. Discovery of isolated shoals in the Permian Maokou Formation of eastern Sichuan Basin and their natural gas exploration potential[J]. Natural gas industry, 2024, 44(6): 1-11.
[26]
张琴, 邱振, 梁峰, 等. 川东北地区中—上二叠统海相页岩储层特征及其地质意义: 以孤峰组—大隆组页岩为例[J]. 海相油气地质, 2025, 30(4): 370-384.
ZHANG Qin, QIU Zhen, LIANG Feng, et al. Characteristics and geological significance of marine shale reservoirs of the Middle-Upper Permian in northeastern Sichuan Basin: a case study of the Gufeng Formation-Dalong Formation shales[J]. Marine origin petroleum geology, 2025, 30(4): 370-384.
[27]
吴勘. 扬子北缘中二叠统孤峰组地球生物学构成及页岩气地质特征[D]. 武汉: 中国地质大学, 2013.
WU Kan. Geobiological composition and geological characters of shale gas from the Middle Permian Gufeng Formation in the northern margin of Yangtze[D]. Wuhan: China University of Geosciences, 2013.
[28]
金之钧, 刘光祥, 王鹏威, 等. 中国南方扬子地区二叠系页岩气勘探潜力与方向[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2025, 46(2): 335-347.
JIN Zhijun, LIU Guangxiang, WANG Pengwei, et al. Exploration potential and targets of the Permian shale gas in the Yangtze Region, South China[J]. Oil & gas geology, 2025, 46(2): 335-347.
[29]
包汉勇, 赵帅, 张莉, 等. 川东红星地区中上二叠统页岩气勘探成果及方向展望[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 12-24.
摘要
基于构造、岩心、测井等资料,采用电镜扫描、低温 N<sub>2</sub>吸附实验、高压压汞实验、盆地模拟等手段,系统分析了川东红星地区中上二叠统页岩的沉积演化、储层特征及页岩气富集模式,明确了勘探有利区,总结了勘探成果及意义。研究结果表明:①红星地区中上二叠统的沉积演化表现为:栖霞组—茅口组三段为开阔台地相;茅四段底部为台地-陆棚相,相带变化快,茅四段顶部为斜坡-陆棚相,地层被剥蚀、南厚北薄;吴家坪组一段(吴一段)底部为海陆过渡滨岸沼泽-潟湖相,吴一段顶部为台地-斜坡-陆棚相,斜坡-陆棚相带分布范围小、相变快;吴二段为斜坡-陆棚相沉积,从早至晚依次受控于古气候、火山活动和古气候、火山活动,沉积中—晚期古生产力较高,TOC 均值大于 8.00%。②研究区茅四段及吴二段陆棚相区发育 2 套优质页岩,具有“高有机碳-高灰质”的特征,富有机质页岩厚度分别为 19 m 和25 m,孔隙类型以有机孔为主,结构以微孔和介孔为主;富碳凝灰岩薄夹层混合质页岩岩相、高碳凝灰岩薄夹层硅质页岩为优质岩相,孔隙度分别为 6.27% 和 6.43%,TOC 值分别为 10.11% 和 9.35%,含气饱和度分别为 92.59% 和 91.81%,脆性指数分别为 55.24% 和 61.19%,是地质和工程的双“甜点”段。③研究区二叠系广泛发育的层状藻为主要有机质来源;在侏罗纪主排烃期,其构造稳定、二叠系烃源岩排烃较少,中侏罗纪—早白垩纪早期为主生气期,构造活动较弱,页岩气的保存条件好,现今已完成生气过程,处于成熟—过成熟阶段,R<sub>o</sub>值约 2.1%,勘探潜力巨大。④建南、龙驹坝、三星区块为有利勘探区,其中建南区块潜力最大;茅四段③小层及吴二段③小层为优质层系的靶窗层段。
BAO Hanyong, ZHAO Shuai, ZHANG Li, et al. Exploration achievements and prospects for shale gas of Middle-Upper Permian in Hongxing area, eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic reservoirs, 2024, 36(4): 12-24.
Based on tectonic,core and logging data,a systematic analysis was conducted on the sedimentary evolution,reservoir characteristics and shale gas enrichment models of Middle-Upper Permian shale in Hongxing area of eastern Sichuan Basin by means of electron microscope scanning,low-temperature N<sub>2</sub> adsorption experiments,high-pressure mercury pressure experiments and basin simulation,the favorable exploration areas were identified,the exploration results and significance were summarized. The results show that:(1)The sedimentary evolution of Middle-Upper Permian in Hongxing area is characterized by open platform facies in QixiaMaokou Formation;platform-shelf facies at the bottom of the fourth member of Maokou Formation,with fast facies change,while slope-shelf facies at the top of the fourth member of Maokou Formation,with strata denuded, thicker in the south and thinner in the north;marine-terrestrial transitional coastal swamp-lagoon facies at the bottom of the first member of WujiapingFormation,while platform-slope-shelf facies at the top of the first member of WujiapingFormation,with small distribution and fast facies change;slope-shelf facies in the second member of WujiapingFormation,which was controlled by paleoclimate,volcanic activity,paleoclimate,and volcanic activity from early to late,with high paleoproductivity during the middle to late sedimentary periods and average <i>TOC</i> greater than 8.00%.(2)Two sets of high-quality shales were developed in the shelf facies areas in the fourth member of Maokou Formation and the second member of Wujiaping Formation,with high organic carbon and high calcite content. Their thicknesses of organic-rich shales are 19 m and 25 m,respectively. The pores are dominated by organic pores,and the structures are mainly micropores and mesopores. The thinly interbedded mixed shale phases of carbon-rich tuff and the thinly interbedded siliceous shale phases of high carbon tuff are high-quality phases,with porosity of 6.27% and 6.43%,<i>TOC</i> of 10.11% and 9.35%,gas saturation 92.59% and 91.81%,and brittleness index of 55.24% and 61.19%,respectively. They are the dual“sweet spots”of geology and engineering.(3)The widely developed Permian stratified algae in the study area are the main source of organic matters. During the mian hydrocarbon expulsion period of Jurassic,the tectonic was stable,with less hydrocarbon expulsion of Permian hydrocarbon source rocks. Middle Jurassic to the early stage of Early Cretaceous was the main gas generation period,with weak tectonic activity and good preservation conditions for shale gas. The gas generation process has been completed and is currently in the mature to over mature stage,with a <i>R</i><sub>o</sub> value of about 2.1%,indicating huge exploration potential.(4)Jiannan,Longjuba and Sanshing blocks are favourable exploration areas,with Jiannan block having the greatest potential. The third sublayer of the fourth member of Maokou Formation and the third layer of the second member of Wujiaping Formation are target-window layer segments of high-quality layers.
[30]
郭彤楼, 刘若冰. 复杂构造区高演化程度海相页岩气勘探突破的启示: 以四川盆地东部盆缘JY1井为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2013, 24(4): 643-651.
摘要
四川盆地东部盆缘JY1井龙马溪组页岩测试获得高产工业气流,经过长时间试采,压力、产量稳定,实现了南方复杂构造、高演化程度海相页岩气的战略突破。通过对JY1井构造、岩性与龙马溪组TOC、热演化程度及矿物含量特征的分析,结合区域地质资料,得到如下启示:①与北美地区不同,在多期构造演化和抬升剥蚀背景下,构造与保存条件是页岩气富集成藏的首要条件;②龙马溪组只有下部优质烃源岩才起到滑脱作用,多期层滑和构造作用形成的网状裂缝是页岩气富集高产的关键;③上奥陶统灰岩为龙马溪组页岩气的形成起到了良好的封隔作用;④与常规气藏不同,断裂和抬升的破坏作用对优质页岩层系的影响相对较弱,对南方广大地区页岩气的勘探具有示范意义。
GUO Tonglou, LIU Ruobing. Implications from marine shale gas exploration breakthrough in complicated structural area at high thermal stage: taking Longmaxi Formation in Well JY1 as an example[J]. Natural gas geoscience, 2013, 24(4): 643-651.
[31]
王必金, 包汉勇, 刘皓天, 等. 川东红星地区吴家坪组富有机质页岩特征与发育控制因素[J]. 地质科技通报, 2023, 42(5): 70-81.
WANG Bijin, BAO Hanyong, LIU Haotian, et al. Characteristics and controlling factors of the organic-rich shale in the Wujiaping Formation of the Hongxing area, eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Bulletin of geological science and technology, 2023, 42(5): 70-81.
[32]
宋腾, 李世臻, 张焱林, 等. 鄂西地区上二叠统海相页岩气富集条件差异与控制因素: 以红星区块吴家坪组二段和恩施地区大隆组为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2023, 34(8): 1425-1441.
摘要
鄂西地区上二叠统海相页岩气资源潜力大,近年来在恩施、红星等地区获得诸多勘探发现,但不同地域页岩气勘探效果不同,储集性能、含气性等富集条件存在诸多差异。以红星区块吴家坪组二段和恩施地区大隆组为研究对象,综合利用钻井、测井、地震和实验室分析测试等资料,开展页岩气富集差异特征精细刻画和控制因素分析。研究发现:①吴家坪组二段与大隆组原始品质较为相似,富有机质页岩厚度略有差异;②吴家坪组二段储集性能、“源—储耦合”性和含气性均优于大隆组,有机质孔保存带来的储集性能差异是造成含气性差异的主要原因;③扬子周缘中—新生代强烈的构造挤压导致恩施地区大隆组初始抬升时间更早、上覆地层剥蚀量更大,页岩气保存条件相对较差;④埋深和构造样式可以有效指示现今保存条件,红星区块吴家坪组二段埋深大、发育在宽缓背斜内,较恩施地区复向斜浅埋藏的大隆组更有利于页岩气富集。综合提出勘探建议,认为两套页岩具有不同的勘探开发难点,应加强对比研究,分类施策。
SONG Teng, LI Shizhen, ZHANG Yanlin, et al. Gas differential enrichment characteristics and controlling factors of Upper Permian marine shale in western Hubei area: case study of Wujiaping Formation Ⅱ in Hongxing block and Dalong Formation in Enshi area[J]. Natural gas geoscience, 2023, 34(8): 1425-1441.

The western Hubei area, which is adjacent to the Sichuan Basin, have great shale gas resources potential in the Upper Permian marine shales, and have achieved a series of exploration discoveries in recent years, such as Enshi, Hongxing and other areas. However, there are many differences in reservoir performance, gas-bearing property and other enrichment conditions, hence the shale gas display effect in different regions are diverse. Taking the Wujiaping Formation II in Hongxing block and Dalong Formation in Enshi area as the research objects, the detailed characterization of shale gas enrichment differences and analysis of controlling factors have been carried out by comprehensive use of drilling, logging, seismic and laboratory analysis and testing data. The results show that: (1) The original quality of the Wujiaping Formation II is relatively similar to that of the Dalong Formation, with a slight difference in the thickness of organic shale; (2) The reservoir performance, source-reservoir coupling and gas-bearing property of the Wujiaping Formation II are better than that of the Dalong Formation; (3) The strong Meso-Cenozoic tectonic compression around the Yangtze led to earlier initial uplift of the Dalong Formation in Enshi area, resulting in greater denudation of the overlying strata, and relatively poor shale gas preservation conditions; (4) The burial depth and structural style can effectively indicate the current preservation conditions. The Wujiaping Formation II in Hongxing block that was deeply buried and developed in a wide -gentle anticline, is more conducive to shale gas enrichment than the Dalong Formation, which is shallowly buried in the complex syncline in Enshi area. There have different structural styles and preservation conditions for two sets of shale in the two areas, which bring different difficulties in exploration and development. Therefore, comparative research should be strengthened and classified practical methods should be taken from the perspective of accelerating exploration and development.

基金

中国石油西南油气田公司科技项目“四川盆地茅口组页岩沉积储层特征研究”(2025-N/G-57130)

编委: 黄革萍
PDF(10846 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/