PDF(14809 KB)
四川盆地普光地区二叠系大隆组超深层页岩气不同岩相储集空间特征及控制因素
王鑫, 李中超, 周凯, 姜淑霞, 李进, 常玉丽, 郑佳冰, 陈一俊
海相油气地质 ›› 2026, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (3) : 236-250.
PDF(14809 KB)
PDF(14809 KB)
四川盆地普光地区二叠系大隆组超深层页岩气不同岩相储集空间特征及控制因素
Reservoir space characteristics and controlling factors of different lithofacies for ultra-deep shale gas of the Permian Dalong Formation in Puguang area, Sichuan Basin
四川盆地普光地区二叠系大隆组超深层页岩气实现勘探突破。然而,受沉积环境多变、岩相类型多样、埋藏深度大等因素影响,不同岩相的孔隙结构特征不明确,严重制约后续页岩气开发。通过地球化学、岩石学分析和孔隙结构表征等手段,系统分析了普光地区大隆组不同岩相的储集空间特征及控制因素。结果表明:①大隆组主要发育富有机质纹层状硅质页岩、高有机质层状混合质页岩、高有机质层状灰质页岩和低有机质页岩。②大隆组共发育8种储集空间类型:有机质内部孔、有机质-基质孔、刚性颗粒粒间孔、黄铁矿晶间孔、溶蚀孔、黏土矿物粒内孔、构造缝、有机质收缩缝。富有机质纹层状硅质页岩相较于其他岩相发育更大尺度和更多数量的有机质孔、溶蚀孔和微裂缝,具有更高的孔隙度、孔体积和中大孔+微裂缝体积占比;低有机质页岩的有机质孔和微裂缝欠发育,无机孔多为孤立分布。③在高成熟热演化阶段,大部分有机质发生降解而被消耗,生成大规模的油气和有机质孔,同时含量高的刚性硅质矿物不仅自身可提供相对简单、开阔的大尺度的粒间孔,也受有机酸溶蚀作用而释放更多的储集空间。因此,随TOC、硅质含量增加,相应的页岩孔隙度、孔体积和中大孔+微裂缝体积占比呈增大趋势。
Exploratory breakthroughs have been achieved in ultra-deep shale gas from the Permian Dalong Formation in Puguang area of Sichuan Basin. However, due to variable sedimentary environments, diverse lithofacies types, and great burial depths, the pore structure characteristics of different lithofacies remain unclear, which severely constrains subsequent shale gas development. Through experiments on geochemistry, petrology, and pore structure characterization, the reservoir space characteristics and controlling factors of different lithofacies of the Dalong Formation in Puguang area are systematically analyzed. The results indicate: (1) The Dalong Formation mainly develops organic-rich laminated siliceous shale, organic-bearing layered mixed shale, organic-bearing layered calcareous shale, and organic-lean shale. (2) Eight types of reservoir spaces are identified: pores within organic matter, organic matter-matrix pores, intergranular pores between rigid particles, pyrite intercrystalline pores, dissolution pores, intraparticle clay pores, tectonic fractures, and organic matter shrinkage fractures. Compared with other lithofacies, the organic-rich laminated siliceous shale develops larger-scale and more numerous organic pores, dissolution pores, and microfractures, exhibiting higher porosity, pore volume, and proportion of medium-large pores and microfractures. In contrast, organic-lean shale has poorly developed organic pores and microfractures, and inorganic pores are mostly isolated. (3) During the high-maturity thermal evolution stage, most organic matter degrades and is consumed, generating large volumes of oil and gas along with organic pores. Meanwhile, high contents of rigid siliceous minerals (such as feldspar and quartz) can not only provide relatively simple and open large-scale intergranular pores but also release more reservoir space through organic acid dissolution. Therefore, as TOC and siliceous content increase, the corresponding porosity, pore volume, and proportion of medium-large pores and microfractures show an increasing trend.
超深层页岩 / 页岩岩相 / 储集空间特征 / 大隆组 / 普光地区 / 四川盆地
ultra-deep shale / shale lithofacies / reservoir space characteristics / Dalong Formation / Pugang area / Sichuan Basin
| [1] |
郭旭升, 王濡岳, 申宝剑, 等. 中国页岩气地质特征、资源潜力与发展方向[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2025, 52(1): 15-28.
|
| [2] |
段金宝, 徐田武, 彭君, 等. 四川盆地东北部铁北1侧HF井二叠系超深层页岩气勘探突破及启示[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2025, 30(4): 44-58.
|
| [3] |
李敏, 刘雅利, 冯动军, 等. 中国海相页岩气资源潜力及未来勘探方向[J]. 石油实验地质, 2023, 45(6): 1097-1108.
|
| [4] |
聂海宽, 党伟, 张珂, 等. 中国页岩气研究与发展20年: 回顾与展望[J]. 天然气工业, 2024, 44(3): 20-52.
|
| [5] |
包书景, 葛明娜, 赵培荣, 等. 中国页岩气勘探开发现状、潜力与发展建议[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2025, 46(2): 348-364.
|
| [6] |
杨雨, 汪华, 谢继容, 等. 页岩气勘探新领域: 四川盆地开江—梁平海槽二叠系海相页岩气勘探突破及展望[J]. 天然气工业, 2023, 43(11): 19-27.
|
| [7] |
胡东风, 魏志红, 王威, 等. 四川盆地东北部雷页1井上二叠统大隆组页岩气勘探突破及其启示[J]. 天然气工业, 2023, 43(11): 28-39.
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
雍锐, 杨洪志, 吴伟, 等. 四川盆地北部二叠系大隆组页岩气富集高产主控因素及勘探潜力[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2025, 52(2): 253-266.
|
| [10] |
李启锐, 谭秀成, 陈雷, 等. 沉积期水下地貌对海相页岩岩相的差异控制:以川南长宁龙马溪组为例[J]. 古地理学报, 2026, 28(1): 158-172.
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
卢双舫, 黄文彪, 陈方文, 等. 页岩油气资源分级评价标准探讨[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39(2): 249-256.
|
| [15] |
李新景, 吕宗刚, 董大忠, 等. 北美页岩气资源形成的地质条件[J]. 天然气工业, 2009, 29(5): 27-32.
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
康家豪, 王兴志, 谢圣阳, 等. 川中地区侏罗系大安寨段页岩岩相类型及储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(4): 53-65.
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
姚艳斌, 刘大锰, 黄文辉, 等. 两淮煤田煤储层孔-裂隙系统与煤层气产出性能研究[J]. 煤炭学报, 2006, 31(2): 163-168.
|
| [20] |
IUPAC. Manual of symbols and terminology[J]. Pure and applied chemistry, 1972, 31: 578.
|
| [21] |
卢双舫, 李俊乾, 张鹏飞, 等. 页岩油储集层微观孔喉分类与分级评价[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(3): 436-444.
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
孙龙德, 刘合, 何文渊, 等. 大庆古龙页岩油重大科学问题与研究路径探析[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2021, 48(3): 453-463.
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
杨雨然, 徐亮, 马维泽, 等. 川东北深层页岩储层成岩作用及对孔隙发育的影响: 以DY1H井吴家坪组—大隆组为例[J]. 海相油气地质, 2024, 29(4): 385-400.
|
| [38] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |